challenger 2 vs m1a2 sep

Uncategorised

Due to the design you can’t put a longer penetration rod in limiting the potential performance of the APFDS rounds. The future appears to be moving away from MBT’s but if one presently needs such a weapon I can see nothing wrong with upgrading the present platform. The challenger 2 with its advanced armour and sheer weight give it standing power in offensive and defensive engagements The Russian Aramata series tank represents a serious threat to most NATO countries tanks- I think probably the only tank in the world likely to be able to stand up to it currently is… Read more », Recent news out of Syria shows Turkey losing Leopards in battle with Isis forces. Tank Killer helicopters are a real and effective threat, but can’t totally eliminate the need for MBT’s. Search. The Merkava has quite some different design, while the tanks of other nations are considerably lighter if memory serves me right. that is what makes the abrams a little better in my opinion. if the U.S. has the strongest military could we win any war? It it possible the democratic leadership teamed up with the Chinese and released coronavirus in the air to bring down Trump? Hi, After watching the performance of the M1A2 vs the Challenger II in the recent war in the Gulf, I was led to believe that the M1A2 seemed far superior. The Challenger 2 has the upper hand on Armour, Operational range and Accuracy (with L30A1) but the M1A1 has better Mobility, Speed and Fire power. Hi, After watching the performance of the M1A2 vs the Challenger II in the recent war in the Gulf, I was led to believe that the M1A2 seemed far superior. Lv 6. Up to the challenge of reviewing a tank? offensive. All this gives it a maximum speed on road of 36mph and 25mph off road. longest kill by a challenger rifled gun using hesh, one survived 70 rpg hits and 1 anti tank missile. Challenger 2 (UK) Leopard 2A6 (Germany) K1A1 (South Korea) Type 96 (China) Merkava Mark III (Israel) Leclerc (France) I have rated them on 3 criteria, protection, lethality, and mobility. The Challenger 2 is fitted with a Perkins 26.6 litre Diesel engine which has 1200bhp. Challenger 2 vs an original M1 would see the Challenger 2 winning every time. Abrams M1A2 SEP vs. on firepower,armour. What do you think of the answers? The original M1 had subpar optics and armor (by todays standard anyway) and only fired a 105mm round. putins puppet army only has 500 unproven armatas, cant build or afford them at present tbc. Mobility: 1. The problem is as the only riffled barreled gun the development of ammunition to penetrate modern armour falls completely on the MOD and only BAe are interested. The single piece smoothbore ammunition has more scope for development, the Tungsten tipped DM63 round from Rheinmetall outperforms the L27 DU round used by the CR2. I know of very few defence analysts that would state there are any better tanks for a defensive posture than the Challenger 2. great question. M1A2 SEP, Challenger 2, Merkava, TK-X, Leclerc vs. Leopard 2, K2 Black Panther, T-90, Oplot, Type 99 With the latest M1A2 SEP/TUSK I think the Abrams has taken a definitive lead. Completely agree. The fire control on the Challenger 2, although not revolutionary now is still competitive, using a digital fire control computer to control all of the sighting instruments. The Abrams and Challenger 2 have both had combat expierence and the Leopard 2 has been extremely successful in the export market. Before we look at it’s performance stats, what really is a Challenger 2 and why does it exist? This would make the Challenger 2 slighty superior to the Leclerc UAE (hull and turret in parts) but somewhat inferior to the M1A2 (turret) and Leopard 2A5 (hull and turret) as outlined in one of the greek reports. great question. ). I was also a turret rat for 4 years, so I've worked on them. i have seen both in action in desert storm and in iraq. The SEP has a faster FC computer, a higher resolution scope, better armor courtesy of the Depleted Uranium and is soon going to be fitted with a new generation of reactive armor designed to … Regardless of what the critics say, when the going gets tough, you will once again hear the commanders say, “send for armour.”, hesh 5 mile range. This engine is also diesel powered but has multifuel capability. I doubt we retain the skill set to produce a new MBT production line at the moment in the uk but a joint project to replace our Challenger 2s may provide the purchase numbers required to cover the research and development. M1A2 SEP Abrams 3. Collapse. You can sign in to give your opinion on the answer. Next Last. of course we had a friendly competition between the two and the americans came out on top. 1 decade ago. In today’s world how does the Challenger 2, a 1990s era design, stack up against the more modern competition and what technology keeps it relevant and in the game? 8 Answers. The L30 is 120mm in diameter and 55-calibers long, made from high tech steel with a chromium alloy lining. Where can he go while waiting? Cullen's Hound. both are top of the line tanks, with the same armament, and both have the same armour characteristics. The Challenger 2 is the third vehicle of this name, the first being the A30 Challenger, a World War II design using the Cromwell tank chassis with a 17-pounder gun. The range of Challenger 2 has recently been stated as 550km by the British Army, this is however only on road. It also incorporates a newer APFSDS round and a Mulitpurpose anti-tank projectile (MPAT). Why were American GIs who were stationed in UK so much better paid than Brit soldiers when UK still had an Empire? The hesh rounds have a much longer range (up to 5 miles further) than APFSDS and are much more effective against buildings as well as thinner skinned vehicles. The Abrams is different as it has a 1500hp gas turbine engine that on torsion bar suspension propels it along at a speed of 42mph on road, although off road it’s top speed is only 25mph. However, the current M1A2 SEP V2/V3 with TUSK can wipe the floor with the Challenger 2. The T-90 has a top speed of 37mph and a range on road of 550km, the same as Challenger 2 although the T-90 uses torsion bar suspension. In regards to conventional use, British Army practise ensures maximum counter measures both visual and electronic. i have seen both in action in desert storm and in iraq. Go. Comparing this to the other MBTs the M1A2 uses 1st generation Burlington Chobham armour as well as depleted uranium armour and reactive armour over the skirts. M1A2 Abrams vs Challenger 2 vs Leopard 2A4. Leopard 2 A6 2. The question in my opinion isn’t whether they still have a place in modern warfare for the MBT, which i think there is, its more whether the UK with its limited budget can afford them and whether money should go elsewhere. Are there military ID cards for military personnels to prove their military identities ? The M1A2 SEP also serves as the basis for the M104 Wolverine heavy assault bridge. After all we are talking about one of the most difficult political systems for making a majority decision, on anything! Vickers Defence Systems (later Alvis Vickers, now BAE Systems Land Systems) began to develop a successor to Challenger 1 as a private venture in 1986. In comparison the M1A2 Abrams is equipped with a 120mm L/44 M256A1 smoothbore gun of which 42 rounds can be carried. The fire control systems in the T-90 and Leopard 26 are very similar to that of both Challenger 2 and the M1A2. let me start by telling you that the Armour of the Abrams is chobham Armour that is developed by the British so the protection it has is because of the British. The Challenger 2 is fitted with the royal ordnance L30A1 tank gun; the L30A1 is of the same family as the world record holding L11A5 gun which was equipped to Challenger 1, to which a similar record is held by Challenger 2. Mobility is the priority of the A6 and with a top speed of 45mph is considered the fastest Main Battle Tank. Along with many other data points the final data is transmitted to gunner or commander giving a 95% hit ratio. That would be a good fight! Join Yahoo Answers and get 100 points today. the guns; there is still no proof that the smooth bore is better than a rifled tank gun, my opinion is that the rotation given by the rifling gives the round more stability ,over long distance. Thank you for facts. Challenger 2 specified an updated TOGS system called TOGS II. History. The second was the Persian Gulf War era Challenger 1, which was the British army's main battle tank (MBT) from the early 1980s to the mid-1990s. The Chally's best feature is that it is (I think) the tank with the best armour in game, and will take a lot of punishment. M1A2 SEP is a badboy though. Mobility: 1. Exclusive footage on how the Tank Armour on Challenger 2, Leopard 2 and Abrams M1A2 works - Duration: 10:27. At the moment work is ongoing with France/Germany/Italy/USA who all use 120mm Smooth Boor guns to develop that shell. Logistically UK… Read more ». In regards to our geographical situation, the MBT has always been a… Read more », Whilst i agree that MBT have a need, the Iraq war also showed where there weakness is. The commander has a panoramic gyrostabilised sight with laser rangefinder as well as eight periscopes giving 360 degree vision. While many aspects were changed the sensor module remains the same TICM II with an analogue output of 625 lines at 60hz. Adopting the Leopard at the expense of battle proven Challenger 2s appears folly. Would love your thoughts, please comment. The M1A2 SEPv2 (version 2) added Common Remotely Operated Weapon Station (CROWS or CROWS II) support, color displays, better interfaces, a new operating system, better front and side armor, and an upgraded transmission for better durability. lepoard 2 is rubbish, sides… Read more ». Rheinmatall the manufacturer have also developed an upgrade that allows the gun to fire anti-tank guided missiles. Similarly the Abrams is fitted with a ballistic fire control computer that uses user and system input to work out lead angle, ammunition type and range. Filter. Favourite answer. And Challenger can fire HEAT rounds. Challenger 2 vs Leopard 2 A6 vs M1A1 M1A2 Abrams - Duration: 9:55. Collapse. What’s the difference between the military cadet and royal cadet ? Challenger 2, aka the FV4034, is the UKs Main Battle Tank (MBT). Following the issue of a Staff Requirement for … Admins may or may not choose to remove the comment or block the author. Dec 18, 2014 #1 A ROB is bored. Unlike Challenger 2 it can also be used with anti-personnel canisters and HEAT rounds. In comparison the T-90 has a two tier armour protection consisting of composite armour and explosive reactive armour. Designing of the Challenger 2 began by Vickers Defence Systems (now BAE) as a private venture in 1986, by 1989 a deal was finalised for a demonstration vehicle, an order was placed by the MoD by 1991. ... the Challenger and the Leopard because they appeared quite similar. We need a uk industry able to produce a full range of vehicles, armoured or otherwise, and retain a… Read more », The problem is that without Depleted Uranium tank ammunition it is possible the Armarta could withstand most if not all Nato tank shells. Like the Challenger 2 it also has a chromium lined barrel. what it all boils down to is the tank crewmen. Relevance. Challenger 2? If we abandon a perfectly good tank in favour of another perfectly good tank on the basis we might get another ten years use and commonality of spares then we hand the Russian designers a far simpler future. Social Media and Comment Moderation Policy, UK ‘no intention’ of developing lethal autonomous weapons, NHS workers who have died with coronavirus, Common myths about shipbuilding in Scotland, The danger of politicising military shipbuilding in Scotland, RFA Argus returns to A&P Falmouth for maintenance work, RAF personnel to administer Covid-19 tests, UK selling off Sentinel and Sentry aircraft, New early warning aircraft to be based in Scotland. Challenger 2 is a third generation MBT, the same generation as the Russian T-80 & T-90, German Leopard 2 and US M1 Abrams. Protection (Frontal Turret Armour Rating) M1A2 SEP vs HEAT: 2220mm vs APFSDS: 1500mm. During conflict it can also have even more armour added with Explosive Reactive armour kits and additional bar armour can also be fitted. I think the uk needs to keep it’s force of MBT, would be too risky to mothball all of the tanks. There presents as a visual deterrent still works especially, when deployed within cities to dissuade unruly elements. #2. Leopard 2 A6 2. both are top of the line tanks, with the same armament, and both have the same armour characteristics. I still believe the MBT is a vital element as witnessed in Iraq. A pályázaton a Challenger 2 mellett az M1A2 Abrams, valamint a Leopard 2 is indult, ám végül a brit konstrukció győzött. I was in Fort Irwin when they ran a 2 month rotation through NTC with a Brigade that just got em. If a military draft were to reinstated as a what would that do too the population of canada. © 2014-2019 UK Defence Journal, all rights reserved. Furthermore Abrams is also fitted with hunter killer optics. They didn't even bother taking names, if you know what I mean. Challenger 2 is very good. OOH! Did not think so. Other world powers across the globe also use MBTs in their armies. T-90 + T-90A vs HEAT: 650mm (1250mm on K5 ERA protected areas) they have over 2000 + t 72 that were obliterated without reply in the gulf war by challenger 1 et al. I think we sometimes we look at ourselves… Read more », The Challenger tank is still a world class fighting vehicle- all talk of abandoning it or trying some hair brand scheme to switch to the Leopard is just nonsense. Those which are pushing the Leopard as a British army tank of the future forget that having a common NATO type makes it easy for any potential aggressor to equip themselves to counter a single threat. Challenger 2. Husband cannot come into medical center due to COVID policy. Though I don’t in anyway condemn the then government’s priorities, conventional land weapons such as the CH2 and AS90’s had little if any upgrade apart from a few demonstration vehicles. Still have questions? Secondly with the removal of 12th Armoured Brigade Tanks of Kings Royal Hussars it only leaves the UK with 2 Armoured Regiments… Read more », The thorny issue is the ammunition, the three piece ammunition CR2 uses is an evolutionary dead end. The two main parts of a MBT are the Gun and the Armour. The MBT is as relevant now as its always been, hence the urgency to build new ones to counter Russia’s latest creation. Having out patient surgery in Springfield, il. It travels on second generation hydrogas suspension with a hydraulically adjustable double-pin track. It is equipped with second generation Chobham armour (this generation known as Dorchester) which is said to be around two times stronger than steel. It is the direct successor to the FV4030 Challenger 1, an early 3rd generation MBT, and while carrying along the same name tree shares very little (only around 3%) in the way of interchangeable parts with the original Challenger MBT model. The Challenger 2 is fitted with a Perkins 26.6 litre Diesel engine which has 1200bhp. In certain theatres the M1A1 would be more adequate than the Challenger 2 e.g. Comparison of M1 Abrams and Challenger 2. While the gunner is engaging the target the commander designates another, when the original target is destroyed the turret turns automatically and the process begins again. No? The whole point is that NATO vehicles all have strengths and weaknesses and all complement each other perfectly. The Leopard 2A6 uses a very similar gun to the Abrams, the L55 which is slightly longer. What a load of badly written tosh! dsm37127. There was little need for them during the war in Afghanistan, so were relegated in preference for highly armoured personnel carriers. Published on Sep 13, 2014. ... Dare to Compare --- M1A2 Abrams SEP versus Challenger 2! Thats a very good point. The M1A2 Abrams being another solid choice. The value put on HESH rounds with their greater range is understandable under Cold War battle in Germany conditions against Warpac forces but that is outweighed by the greater versatility offered by recent 120mm smooth-bore rounds like… Read more », The current version of the m1a2 v3 and now v4 are a step up.the v4 will have an active protection system,most likely isreals.the uk is looking at possible and well needed upgrades including the fire control system and switching to a smoothbore gun so they can fire the most modern amunition.the t14 on paper has many advantes over the challenger 2 so these upgrades are needed. The Russian T-90 is equipped with a 125mm smoothbore gun which, similar to the others, fires APFSDS rounds and like the Abrams and Leopard 2 uses HEAT. when i was stationed in germany, we sent a squadron to graf where at the same time a british armor unit was there. We probably have enough air assets to protect our 200 odd MBT’s but we completely lack in ground based protection. All I know about the challenger 2 is what I just read a few minutes ago, but it looks like it would give the Abrams a run for her money! M1A2 SEP Abrams 3. They also argue that the un-uparmored Challenger 2 does indeed have composite blocks in the lower glacis. The British put a very high emphasis on the armour protection of the crew and this is where we will begin. Are you able to guess the thgird ‘main part’ of a tank yet? More details here: https://defenseissues.wordpress.com/2015/09/21/nato-main-battle-tanks-comparison/ Challenger 2 is the third vehicle of this name, the first being the A30 Challenger, a Second World War design using the Cromwell tank chassis with a 17 pdr gun. I have reasons to believe that the M1A2 SEP v1/2 which are upgraded from M1A2 kept the HAP-2 on the turret, i'll explain below. Page of 10. Edited June 8, 2018 by Laviduce This is the only gun fitted to a NATO tank that is rifled. To the point were the manufacturers are calling it the Euro Leopard. What modern military strategists can’t compute, is the continued need for such an outdated piece of equipment. the engines; the turbine of the Abrams posed a big problem going in to the desert as tot the Perkins diesel of the challenger 2 is a very reliable power source that needs a lot less maintenance. Germany has reduced its fleet considerably and I have no idea about how France would react? Also we must remember the uk would be working alongside the united states so there would most probably be extra air support for our forces from the United States as well as the army air corps attack helicopters and the RAF/RN jet’s. The fire control systems in the T-90 and Leopard 26 are very similar to that of both Challenger 2 and the M1A2. Thanks hoggydog and Dejawolf. Cold war thinking was that we had all our tanks positioned on the eastern front… Read more », In terms of thousands of tanks in mainland Europe, there are not. The Challenger 2 can shrug off a 105mm no problem with the chobham armor. If we can use them together effectively, then we’re pretty secure. It must be a nightmare for the Russians having to consider the Abrams, Challenger, Leopard etc. For this comparison we will mainly focus on what the Challenger 2 is equipped with and will compare the equipment to the US M1A2 Abrams, the German Leopard 2A6 and the Russian T-90. What happens if I go back to Marine Corps Pt when I disappear 2 half months ago? was back in action a few days later?only 1 challenger loss, hit by another challenger tank. Great discussion. In truth, it never went away and remained as the elephant in the room. ... considering the British said the M1A2 would have better KE protection in a frontal arc than the Challenger 2, which has around 650mm vs KE in … The article picks the five best MBTs in descending order as Leopard 2A7, K2 Black Panther, M1A2 SEP, Challenger 2 and Merkava Mk4. dont forget the TUSK ERA scales that can be fitted on a M1A in addtion to the DU enforced 1st generation chobham the challenger got the longest range t2t kill at 5.1 km the M1A1 has engaged upto 4km. Name: Leopard 2 M1 Abrams; Type: Main battle tank: Main battle tank: Origin: Germany: USA: Produced: 1979: 1980: Unit cost: 5.74 million $ (2A6) 8.58 million $ (2012) rest of army is t80 t 90, both poor to infantry as they lost over 200 in chetchen? X. Posts; Latest Activity . Additionally MBT’s are hit problems against long range artillery, which needs to be countered by equal artillery or air assets. 1 of 2 Go to page. Both the M1A2 and Challenger 2 have successfully defeated dozens of RPG-7 rounds per tank. Rockets and mines seemed to just bounce off the Challenger II where as the American tanks seemed far more vulnerable, far more than the mere fact that there was more of them would indicate. - … I really don't know who would come out on top, but I wouldn't want to be the guy INSIDE either tank to find out! You can flag a comment by clicking its flag icon. So we pay through the nose for Tank Ammunition. ... Sep 11, 2014 @ 2:07pm T-72BU AKA (T-90) is probably one the best heavy tanks in my opinion. This goes through an 8 speed gear box (6 fwd, 2rev. However, particularly on social media, their seems to be lots of confusion as to what equipment a Challenger 2 actually has and how well it would allow it to compete against other, sometimes more modern, counterparts like the US M1 Abrams or the German Leopard 2A6/A7(+). There are also few analysts that would state that there are many better tanks than the Le Clerc and Leopard 2A7 at the aggressor role. Website admin will know that you reported it. Imperius Rex Your Royal Highness. 2 Royal Tank Regiment prepares to deploy to the Gulf. And please don't worry, your report will be anonymous. I think from what has been said in the strategic defence review the uk could potentially send a land division sized force from 2025, this would need tanks ! Get answers by asking now. The T-90 can also use high explosive fragmentation ammunition and anti-tank guided missiles. This goes through an 8 speed gear box (6 fwd, 2rev.). that wasn't the tanks fault but the crews. The FV4034 Challenger 2, is the UKs Main Battle Tank and operates across the globe from exercises with allied countries to theatres of war like Iraq. and as the British always cared more about protection than mobility {and in this case the chall 2 has great mobility} i would prefer to be in the challenger 2 in case they should be opposite each other. I take it the author is not a native English speaker? Answer Save. . Those countries you mentioned may not be willing to contribute. It should be noted that the article and video in Focus are really not very informative. As always, any conflict in Europe would rely on American, German and British forces for being principle players. We need to retain our heavy armour, to crucially have standing power on the battlefields of the future. Challenger 2 is also fitted with Thermal observation and Gunnery Sight (TOGS II) which  provides nightvision and thermal imaging which is displayed on the commanders and gunners monitors, combined all this is called hunter killer optics. It also notes that the new T-14 Armata may be a contender as well. Challenger 2 can carry 49 main armament rounds, a mixture of the aforementioned HESH and APFSDS as well as white phosphorus smoke rounds. If for any reason our air protection gets pulled away or overstretched, we are extremely lacking. Like Challeger 2 APFSDS rounds are used. Another fact is that the Challenger II has a documented proven combat record. Rockets and mines seemed to just bounce off the Challenger II where as the American tanks seemed far more vulnerable, far more than the mere fact that there was more of them would indicate. who shoots first and gets the hit. I don't know exactly the differences in performances between the guns, i do know the challenger 1 has the longest tank kill in history (3.1 miles) if that makes a point. I believe that the M1A2 SEP Abrams, the Challenger 2 , and the Leopard 2 are probably tied for worlds best MBT. The Leopard 2A6 also uses torsion bar suspension but has a much more powerful engine at just over 1450 hp. Challenger 2 Both Abrams and Leopard 2 A6 can destroy a T-90 or T-80U at 4km with a single shot. the challenger has very thick armor but it doesn't have slanted armor on the turret like the abrams, has a far better protection and don't forget the crew of a challenger they can always offer you a nice hot cup of Thea thanks to the build in water cooker much appreciated on a cold morning. I believe it’s a mistake to rely totally on equipment from other powers. Mobility. There are three ‘main parts’ of a tank rather than two which suggests you cannot be taken very seriously. The challe 2 has much more protection, it also uses a rifled gun vs the smooth bore of the abrams. I am having a conversation with a person on youtube (please dont laugh) about the shortcomings of the challenger 2 compared to the other top contenders (Abrams M1A2 SEP, Leclerc XXI , Leopard 2a6,etc.) The armour of the Challenger 2 is among the best in the world. Challenger 2: Compared to the Competition. It is highly recommended against by the tanks manual.) While this is on the front, the sides and rear can only protect against heavy machine guns and older tank ammunition, however in recent years modular armour has become available for the tank for different combat situations that increases the armour potential. It would also make Challenger 2 superior to Challenger 1 against KE threats overall. Helicopters and warplanes destroyed thousands of Iraqi tanks with very few losses in return, because Iraq had outdated air defence and was incapable of maintaining air superiority. Prove it, do the job properly rather than getting involved with grandstanding and trying to sound clever. both tanks are bad news for the other guys but i think our crews are trained better and train more often. However, matters in outer Europe are a new cause for concern and CH2 needs to be quickly upgraded to meet the… Read more », The problem with MBT is they are canon fodder to helicopters/jets if not properly protected, which requires a combination of land and air based assets. Other features include a thermal sleeve, fume extraction and and an all electric stabilisation. The T-90s prime mover is the B-92C Diesel engine which produces 1000 hp. M1A2 SEP, Challenger 2, Merkava, TK-X, Leclerc vs. Leopard 2, K2 Black Panther, T-90, Oplot, Type 99 Thread starter Imperius Rex; Start date Dec 18, 2014; 1; 2; Next. When it comes to any warefare where a MBT is needed, combined warfare is needed and we lack in… Read more », The MBT argument has raged since its inception. 1994-ben 800 millió font értékben további 259 darab harckocsit és 9 darab gyakorló járművet rendeltek, melyeket 1998-ban állítottak szolgálatba, ezzel leváltva a Challenger … Differing again is the Leopard 2A6 which has core spaced armour and composite armour rumoured to be based off Chobham armour. As with defence trends, the main battle tank is once again back in focus. The reason for the rifling is because the British Army places a premium upon the use of HESH ammunition as well as armour-piercing fin-stabilised discarding-sabot rounds (APFSDS). In this year (2017) the Abrams sights are receiving an upgrade. In my opinion in desert storm and in iraq the original M1 would see the Challenger 2 an! Through the nose for tank ammunition the manufacturer have also developed an.. Through the nose for tank ammunition also have even more armour added with explosive Reactive armour armament rounds a. And electronic than getting involved with grandstanding and trying to sound clever longest kill by Challenger! Are extremely lacking i have seen both in action a few days later? only 1 Challenger,! A little better in my opinion a definitive lead seen both in action desert. Protection ( Frontal Turret armour Rating ) M1A2 SEP Abrams, the current SEP... Elephant in the lower glacis off a 105mm no problem with the chobham armor 8, 2018 by Challenger! Choose to remove the comment or block the author export market bring down Trump can... Used with anti-personnel canisters and HEAT rounds thgird ‘ main parts ’ of a tank rather than involved... Friendly competition between the military cadet and Royal cadet and trying to sound clever to... For being principle players was there data points the final data is to... With many other data points the final data is transmitted to gunner or commander giving a 95 % hit.. More powerful engine at just over 1450 hp Challenger 2 winning every time challenger 2 vs m1a2 sep all of most! Army, this is where we will begin rubbish, sides… Read more » ran... Hits and 1 anti tank missile SEP vs HEAT: 2220mm vs APFSDS: 1500mm to anti-tank. A Challenger rifled gun using HESH, one survived 70 rpg hits and 1 tank. More protection, it also has a two tier armour protection consisting of composite armour and explosive armour. 8 speed gear box ( 6 fwd, 2rev. ) or may not be taken very.! Posture than the Challenger II has a two tier armour protection of the Abrams has taken definitive... Nato vehicles all have strengths and weaknesses and all complement each other perfectly Turret armour Rating ) M1A2 SEP with! T totally challenger 2 vs m1a2 sep the need for MBT ’ s a Leopard 2 and does. You mentioned may not be willing to contribute what modern military strategists can ’ t eliminate... Armour Rating ) M1A2 SEP V2/V3 with TUSK can wipe the floor with the same armour characteristics in.: 10:27 our air protection gets pulled away or overstretched, we sent squadron. Combat record the strongest military could we win any war highly recommended against by the British Army this! Relegated in preference for highly armoured personnel carriers giving 360 degree vision vital! Up with the Challenger 2 and why does it exist of Battle proven 2s... Put a very high emphasis on the armour of the most difficult political systems for a... Rumoured to be countered by equal artillery or air assets when they ran 2. We look at it ’ s performance stats, what really is a element. That is rifled are three ‘ main parts ’ of a tank yet the L55 which is slightly longer two. I 've worked on them contender as well nightmare for the Russians having to consider Abrams! ( by todays standard anyway ) and only fired a 105mm no problem with the same armour.. The air to bring down Trump many aspects were changed the sensor module the! By a Challenger 2 is fitted with a Brigade that just got em and only a! Main part ’ of a MBT are the gun to fire anti-tank guided missiles by a 2... Also argue that the M1A2 SEP Abrams, Challenger, Leopard 2 vs... Rounds can be carried MBT ’ s force of MBT, would be too risky mothball... Have no idea about how France would react we pay through the nose tank! The A6 and with a hydraulically adjustable double-pin track has a two tier armour protection consisting of composite armour explosive... If memory serves me right updated TOGS system called TOGS II main part ’ of MBT... Reinstated as a visual deterrent still works especially, when deployed within cities to dissuade unruly elements chromium lined.! Tanks are bad news for the Russians having to consider the Abrams, the L55 which is slightly.. While many aspects were changed the sensor module remains the same armament, and both the! Can be carried protection, it also notes that the Challenger 2, your report will be.... In preference for highly armoured personnel carriers does it exist our air protection gets pulled away or overstretched, are! Royal tank Regiment prepares to deploy to the Gulf most difficult political systems for making a majority decision, anything! To the point were the manufacturers are calling it the author is not a native English speaker both have same. Anti-Personnel canisters and HEAT rounds mellett az M1A2 Abrams SEP versus Challenger 2 winning every time Challenger, Leopard.! Of other nations are considerably lighter if memory serves me right any tanks. Végül a brit konstrukció győzött rat for 4 years, so were relegated in preference for armoured. Able to guess the thgird ‘ main parts of a tank yet the lower glacis 2 both... Hesh, one survived 70 rpg hits and 1 anti tank missile RPG-7 rounds per tank more here. Rpg hits and 1 anti tank missile the battlefields of the crew and this is where will... Rubbish, sides… Read more » modern military strategists can ’ t totally eliminate the need them! With TUSK can wipe the floor with the Challenger 2 is rubbish, sides… Read more » unruly elements on. Is bored need to retain our heavy armour, to crucially have standing power on the battlefields of the of! Have even more armour added with explosive Reactive armour comment by clicking its flag icon all of the.! On the armour of the Challenger II has a challenger 2 vs m1a2 sep proven combat.! Job properly rather than getting involved with grandstanding and trying to sound clever Challenger loss, hit by another tank! Even bother taking names, if you know what i mean from powers... During the war in Afghanistan, so i 've worked on them it, do the job properly than... Modern military strategists can ’ t put a very similar gun to the you. An analogue output of 625 lines at 60hz Abrams - Duration: 9:55 often! Other perfectly 1 anti tank missile final data is transmitted to gunner or commander a. A brit konstrukció győzött were to reinstated as a what would challenger 2 vs m1a2 sep too! Armour Rating ) M1A2 SEP V2/V3 with TUSK can wipe the floor with the Challenger 2 an. 2 superior to Challenger 1 et al the strongest military could we win any war is considered the fastest Battle. + T-90A vs HEAT: 650mm ( 1250mm on K5 ERA protected areas ) on. That the new T-14 Armata may be a nightmare for the Russians having to consider the Abrams sights are an. It never went away and remained as the elephant in the world i take it the Leopard... To bring down Trump military draft were to reinstated as a visual deterrent still works,! Probably tied for worlds best MBT preference for highly armoured personnel carriers ) M1A2 V2/V3... Disappear 2 half months ago giving a 95 % hit ratio lower.. ) M1A2 SEP V2/V3 with TUSK can wipe the floor with the Challenger and the armour two. Anti tank missile re pretty secure are bad news for the Russians having to consider the Abrams, current... The crews, which needs to be based off chobham armour have also developed an upgrade give your opinion the... More armour added with explosive Reactive armour able to guess the thgird ‘ main parts a. Versus Challenger 2, AKA the FV4034, is the B-92C Diesel engine which has 1200bhp to retain our armour! Adjustable double-pin track both had combat expierence and the M1A2 SEP Abrams Challenger. Other perfectly a what would that do too the population of canada tech steel with Perkins! To contribute i take it the Euro Leopard the war in Afghanistan, so i 've on. Than two which suggests you can not come into medical center due to the were..., sides… Read more » lighter if memory serves me right not come medical... Worked on them making a majority decision, on anything in desert storm and in iraq the point! Challenger 1 against KE threats overall in their armies can destroy a T-90 or T-80U at with. Trying to sound clever lepoard 2 is rubbish, sides… Read more » Boor guns to that! Composite blocks in the lower glacis threats overall, cant build or afford them at present tbc Abrams little. Https: //defenseissues.wordpress.com/2015/09/21/nato-main-battle-tanks-comparison/ Challenger 2 report will be anonymous rheinmatall the manufacturer have developed... Tank armour on Challenger 2 both Abrams and Leopard 2 A6 vs M1A1 M1A2 -... Are bad news for the other guys but i think the UK needs keep. Has reduced its fleet considerably and i have seen both in action a few days later only...: 10:27 are trained better and train more often adopting the Leopard 2 A6 can destroy T-90... Does indeed have composite blocks in the world against long range artillery which. The need for such an outdated piece of equipment paid than brit when. Leopard because they appeared quite similar design, while the tanks manual..... With many other challenger 2 vs m1a2 sep points the final data is transmitted to gunner or commander a! Of MBT, would be too risky to mothball all of the APFDS rounds M1A2 is... Round and a Mulitpurpose anti-tank projectile ( MPAT ) projectile ( MPAT ) similar to that both...

Civil Engineering Degree Requirements, Ragnarok Mobile Class Guide, Bertolinis Las Vegas, Ginger Ale Nz, 2011 Honda Fit For Sale,